| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. ICE Mining ruined by spawn changes, multiboxers and farmers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This thread should be closed as a duplicate of the following thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=387571
In other words, you have won, you don't have to rub our noses in it.
- by Jason Xado - at 2015.03.26 14:55:10
|
22. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sexy Cakes wrote: I'm simply trying to bring you all back on the topic which is input automation. It is not only about input automation, as has been shown in the security talk at Fanfest. They now consider more than input automation to be ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2015.03.26 14:42:51
|
23. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well I tried the single account thing for a bit, just to give CCP the benefit of the doubt. Conclusion, this game is boring with a single account. Since this is a feedback thread here is my feedback: 1.) I don't like this change. 2.) I'm leaving....
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.12.17 13:46:29
|
24. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: If it's not, then I honestly can't see what else they are trying to accomplish. If there is anything else, then they missed. I'd be VERY surprised if they tried to get rid of multiboxing altogether. So you are saying the...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.12.10 18:19:01
|
25. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Getting rid of broadcasting is seen as a quick win. It's relatively easy to spot and makes a lot of idiots who don't realise how ISBoxer is used happy for a short while. Do you really think that is what CCP is trying to ac...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.12.10 17:55:00
|
26. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bethan Le Troix wrote: I don't understand why people are trying find loopholes to get around the ruling or try to twist words to justify continuing what they have been doing. Either accept the ruling or WoW is other there >>>>>&g...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.12.10 17:23:06
|
27. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miomeifeng Alduin wrote: you need clarification for that? See one of the first pages, 1 input = 1 action. If this is true: you have nothing to worry about. 1 input = more than 1 action: not allowed. How long should one pause between words? ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.12.05 22:50:40
|
28. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This whole situation is insane. 1.) CCP says you can't use the multicast feature in ISBoxer. 2.) Well with video FX (which CCP has said windows management features are fine) I get the same functionality, just have to click once per client. So in...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.12.05 21:49:45
|
29. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
While I can't say I agree with CCP's decision in this regards, I do understand it and I do respect it. I will miss the ice mining, but it appears to be time to lay off my "employees" and go find something else worthwhile to do within New Eden.
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.11.25 22:44:10
|
30. total multibox domination - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hausser0815 wrote: play eve more rts style This guy gets it :-)
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.11.17 17:42:51
|
31. total multibox domination - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you simply think of EvE as an MMO-RTS, then all your objections go away. To each his own in my humble opinion.
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.11.17 15:31:39
|
32. Did you know - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Novemis wrote: Jason Xado wrote: My only problem with the idea is NPC stations. I thought the design philosophy for the game was more player and less NPC, at least that is the gist I got from the Fanfest videos. Nah, it's supposed to be a...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.11.07 13:42:37
|
33. Did you know - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The new wormhole system sounds pretty cool. My only problem with the idea is NPC stations. I thought the design philosophy for the game was more player and less NPC, at least that is the gist I got from the Fanfest videos. I wish they would al...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.11.06 20:56:53
|
34. A discussion on Isboxing and the consequences of linear gameplay. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Embrace EvE as an MMO-RTS and all your ISBoxer concerns go away. Would you play Age of Empires with just one villager?
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.11.06 14:52:08
|
35. More ruthlessness, less madness? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EvE is a sandbox. Any PvP you wish to participate in has as much meaning as you want to give it. I can assure you that there is a lot of meaningful and rewarding PvP happening in EvE.
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.10.31 22:03:41
|
36. Is this really Eve? Am I missing something? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Deimos UK wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Try Providence. Thats where I encounter most the camps, assuming you aint taking the ****.. YM- OXI is just PL camp Well in that case I would simply suggest some patience. Most of the time I pass thro...
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.10.29 19:25:41
|
37. Is this really Eve? Am I missing something? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Try Providence.
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.10.29 19:14:14
|
38. Thirty plus Procurer botlike armada in Osmon ice belts. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chicknhawk wrote: Bot You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means Seriously though, multiboxing is valid gameplay.
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.01.06 02:14:00
|
39. Thirty plus Procurer botlike armada in Osmon ice belts. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Multiboxing is valid gameplay.
- by Jason Xado - at 2014.01.03 15:32:00
|
40. Multiple Accounts = Downfall of Eve - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Multiboxing is valid gameplay. And yes, they do pay the bills, just like everyone else. PLEXs do not spontaneously spawn. EvE is an MMO-RTS.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.11.29 12:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |